Next: 3. Results
Up: 2. Discussion of theories
Previous: 2.2 The Elwert-Haug approximation
2.3 The exact partial wave method
In the exact partial wave method we include the exact numerical atomic
potential in the unperturbed Hamiltonian. In this case the
interaction (for bremsstrahlung from a neutral atom) is not with the
Coulomb potential (as in the Elwert-Haug case) but with the screened
Coulomb potential, so no form factor approximation is needed.
Furthermore, no approximation in
is made, but
rather the full partial wave solutions are obtained numerically to an
order in
needed for convergence of the matrix element. The
Dirac equation is separated into angular and (coupled) radial
equations. We obtain numerical solutions of specified energy E of
the radial Dirac equation, labeled by the quantum numbers
and
m. The quantum number
..., corresponds
to eigenvalues of the operator
;
m is
the eigenvalue of Jz, where
is the orbital angular
momentum operator, and Jz is the z component of the total angular
momentum operator. A linear combination of eigenstates
is taken which obeys the appropriate boundary conditions (plane
wave plus incoming or outgoing spherical wave). The photon
interaction ``operator'',
,
is expanded into a multipole series
[12]. We may represent the three fold summation over
incident and outgoing electron partial waves and photon angular
momenta in the matrix element symbolically as
,
where
represents the
photon angular momenta and parity and the electron angular momentum
quantum numbers. Thus we write
|
(3) |
and the expression for the polarized cross section is
|
(4) |
The matrix elements in this summation involve radial integrals of the
form
where
and
are the small and large components of
the initial and final spinors and jl(kr) are the spherical Bessel
functions. Such integrals over rapidly oscillating functions are
evaluated using the well tested computer program of Tseng
[13]. These integrals depend only on p1, p2, kand Z. The summation in Eq. (3) to obtain the
total matrix element is performed numerically before squaring to
obtain the cross section. A more detailed description of our
formalism can be found in [4].
Next: 3. Results
Up: 2. Discussion of theories
Previous: 2.2 The Elwert-Haug approximation
Eoin Carney
1999-06-14